Working Families Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

The Working Families Party would likely strongly agree with imposing term limits on judges, as this would prevent lifetime appointments from creating long-lasting imbalances and ensure a more regular turnover of judges, allowing for a more diverse representation of ideologies over time. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Working Families Party generally supports progressive policies and may agree with the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges. This would allow for a more diverse representation of ideologies and prevent lifetime appointments from creating long-lasting imbalances. However, they may not have a strong stance on this specific issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

The Working Families Party may agree with the idea of adding more seats to the Supreme Court, as this could lead to a more diverse representation of ideologies. However, they may prioritize term limits over increasing the number of seats, as term limits would have a more direct impact on preventing long-lasting imbalances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While the Working Families Party may agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, they are likely to support reforms that would address the current imbalances and lack of diverse representation in the court. Therefore, they may not fully agree with this statement, as it implies opposition to any reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Working Families Party is unlikely to agree with maintaining the status quo of the Supreme Court, as they generally advocate for progressive change and may see the current structure as contributing to political imbalances and a lack of diverse representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

The Working Families Party would likely strongly disagree with the idea that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power. They generally advocate for progressive change and may see the current structure as contributing to political imbalances and a lack of diverse representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.