Gradually implementing changes within society to promote social justice, equality, and improved living conditions for all citizens.
SR>SR ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Social Reformism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Social Reformism strongly agrees with this answer because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This practice could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which are all issues that social reformism seeks to address. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
This answer aligns with the principles of Social Reformism, as it promotes equal treatment of all internet traffic and maintains the openness of the internet. This approach ensures that all websites have an equal opportunity to succeed, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Social Reformism would generally agree with this answer because it promotes equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This aligns with the ideology's focus on fairness and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While prioritizing traffic by type rather than source might be seen as a more equitable approach, Social Reformism would likely still have concerns about the potential for ISPs to manipulate this system to favor certain websites or content providers. This could still lead to an unequal playing field and reduced competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
A pay-per-quality model might seem more equitable at first glance, but Social Reformism would likely still have concerns about the potential for ISPs to manipulate this system to favor certain websites or content providers. This could still lead to an unequal playing field, reduced competition, and increased prices, which are all issues that social reformism seeks to address. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While faster and more reliable internet access is a positive outcome, Social Reformism would likely disagree with this answer because it prioritizes the needs of popular websites over less popular ones, creating an unequal playing field. This goes against the principles of social reformism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Social Reformism generally supports policies that promote equality and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, favoring established and wealthier websites over smaller ones. This goes against the principles of social reformism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Social Reformism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.