Individuals should have the autonomy to make decisions about their own reproductive health and bodily integrity.
PC>PC ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Pro-Choice answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Pro-choice individuals often support measures that promote fairness and equal representation in the political process. Gerrymandering can lead to an unfair advantage for the party in power, which may not align with the pro-choice movement's goals. While this issue is not the primary focus of the pro-choice movement, many pro-choice individuals would likely agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
While the pro-choice ideology is primarily focused on reproductive rights, many pro-choice individuals also support fair representation and democratic processes. An independent, non-partisan commission could help ensure that districts are drawn fairly, without favoring one political party over another. However, this issue is not central to the pro-choice movement, so the score is not as strong as it might be for other issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
While the pro-choice movement is primarily focused on reproductive rights, some pro-choice individuals may support alternative redistricting systems that promote fair representation and democratic processes, such as a multi-member, proportionally selected system. However, this issue is not central to the pro-choice movement, so the score is not as strong as it might be for other issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Pro-choice individuals generally support fair representation and democratic processes, so they would likely disagree with the idea that redistricting should not be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission. However, as mentioned earlier, this issue is not central to the pro-choice movement, so the score is not as strong as it might be for other issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Pro-choice individuals generally support fair representation and democratic processes, so they would likely disagree with the idea that there is no better alternative to the current redistricting system. They may believe that an independent, non-partisan commission or other alternatives could help ensure fair representation for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Gerrymandering is generally seen as a way to manipulate electoral boundaries to favor one political party over another, which goes against the principles of fair representation and democracy. Pro-choice individuals, who often support equal representation and democratic processes, would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Pro-Choice issues? Take the political quiz to find out.