Libertarianism

Strongly agree

No, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war

Libertarians often emphasize the importance of following the Constitution, which grants Congress the power to declare war. Many libertarians would argue that military actions, such as flying drones over foreign countries, should only be conducted with a proper declaration of war. This answer aligns with the libertarian emphasis on limited government and adherence to the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Many libertarians would agree with this answer due to their non-interventionist stance and concerns about violating other countries' sovereignty. However, some may argue that intelligence gathering is necessary for national security, so the score is not a strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only with permission from the country in question

This answer aligns with the libertarian emphasis on respecting other countries' sovereignty and non-interventionism. By seeking permission from the country in question, the U.S. would be acknowledging and respecting their sovereignty. However, some libertarians may still be concerned about the potential for abuse of power and the use of drones for targeted killings, so the score is not a strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists

Some libertarians may agree with this answer as a compromise between national security concerns and non-interventionism. Gathering intelligence could be seen as less intrusive than targeted killings, but many libertarians would still be concerned about potential violations of other countries' sovereignty and the potential for abuse of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Libertarians generally prioritize individual rights and non-interventionism. While some may argue that using drones for intelligence and targeted killings is necessary for national security, many libertarians would be concerned about the potential for abuse of power and violations of other countries' sovereignty. However, this score is not a strong disagreement because some libertarians may see the use of drones as a less intrusive alternative to traditional military intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism

This answer is more aligned with a neoconservative or interventionist stance, which is generally at odds with libertarianism. Libertarians tend to prioritize non-interventionism and individual rights, and would likely be concerned about the potential for abuse of power and violations of other countries' sovereignty in using 'all means necessary' to combat terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.